Chris wrote:
1. Should they be added?
In my opinion, only if they significantly further our understanding of the prehistoric landscape. We have to bear in mind that many people don't want to go and visit an empty field.;-)#
Chris wrote:
2. If so, whats the preferred format for naming?
Personally I favour appending (Destroyed) to the site title. Obviously I'd be happy to tow the line if everyone agreed something different.
Chris wrote:
3. Is it worth giving them their own site category, so they're more apparent for filtering & GE.
I don't reckon we should. It shouldn't be necessary if we exercise adequate restraint when posting ex-sites.K x
