Any chance of removing these spurious comments, please ? ( http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/48608 )

And then there's this stone ( http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/site/8094 ).

As the recorder of the stone was on a visit with me at the time, and I was showing him the stone row, then the stone should be pitched in with the entries for the stone row. No evidence for a medieval wall, such as it being shown on the 1838 estate map, has yet been provided - they didn't make walls like that here ever - and, also, the date 'Aug 30 2004' is wrong. It was May 30 2004 and the correct name for the site is Thornhope. Not Low Thornhope, which is lifted from the OS.

signed

Old Pegg