close

“This rock is in the adjoining field and the five marks are each (coincidentally) two megalithic inches long. The pattern is too irregular to have been made by a modern stone cutter and 'points' toward a large mound, named Priests Crown, a mile or so across the Barrow Bridge Brook valley.”

http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/50973

Sorry to offer an alternative view, but the marks look regular, the size could have something to do with the same chisel being used, and the reason for their orientation could have something to do with it being the stones longest axis, thus less feathering! It may not have been modern man that created these marks, I understand that in some areas pretty much the same methods were used from Roman though to Victorian times.

Hi rockrich, yet again we are in the arena of the unwell! yes gateposts lamposts and lampoonery are the order of the day. MM

Yes, I can imagine those gaps being plugged with very dry elm and then water being poured over. But the boulder is in association with a pretty much confirmed (by me) Neolithic monument. And that alters everything. There are other stones nearby that have been chiseled - but assuming which era it happened in isn't easy. It's the connection of the sizes of the holes with megalithic inches that persuades me that they are Neolithic. Thom's last book - often overlooked - is worth perusing as they (father and son) overlay idealised cup and ring diagrams over known rock art figures. They show pretty good agreement ...