Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (again)

close
more_vert
Hob H
Hob Sep 11, 2006 22:19:47
Replying to Pixxx

Well said.

I don't know that I agree, probably 'cos I've got too much science in my head to easily hold with the new agey interpretation of 'Energies'. But then I've also got too much science in my head to easily hold with the scientific interpretation of 'Energy' as being the only way to look at things. You know, like when you go so far in one direction that you meet yourself coming back?

Energy. It's just a word. Personally, I really don't know what I believe in, and I really enjoy not knowing.

Anyway, cheers Pix, for having the guts to nip in here and proudly hoist your flag in a non-confrontational manner, even though your beliefs go against the grain of tma splab.

P Pixxx
Pixxx Sep 12, 2006 10:06:04
Replying to Hob

I know what you mean about 'energy' as a word. I don't entirely agree with it myself. I haven't really thought about it to any extent which is probably why I can't explain what I mean properly. But as I said before, I KNOW I have experienced rumblings and vibrations (even they sound like crap words) at ancient sites. I've also felt them elsewhere, to a greater or lesser degree in woods, on hills, built up areas, anywhere. Maybe I'll visit Arbor Low and take a notebook with me this time, instead of my sketchpad.

I don;t think that 'energies' are that far removed from science, its just theres no proof at the moment.

Splab is a grate word, btw, really grate!!

Pix xx