close
more_vert

Moth wrote:
Hi Dok, you seem to have a real bee in your bonnet about this and it's now spread over 2 or more threads.
Ummm... I don't think that's entirely fair, seeing as this thread was specifically started on the topic, straight on the back of the other one. Am I not allowed to express a contrary opinion now?

If you really want to discuss it, how about starting a thread asking people if they think it's cliquey here?
I would hypothesise that the general attitude on the forum has probably already put off a lot of people with contrary views to the norm, so you'd kinda be asking the wrong people.

'clique' is such a pejorative term....
Not really. I'm not suggesting an intentional clique. Cliques generally arise because people form a tight-knit group. They're not generally conspiracies intended to exclude others. To be honest though, you seem to be set on taking offence at whatever I say, and I really can't be arsed to get into an argument about this. It's just an opinion - not an attack.

LOL! I wasn't taking offence. I knew I should kept out of it, as I'm not really interested in the debate.

I was just trying to be constructive by separating the 'accusation' of cliquiness (the word IS pejorative, whether you meant it that way or not) from the discussion of the different approaches to ancient sites and their relative merits for this board.

love

Moth