close
more_vert

whatisthat wrote:
If anyone has a problem with a geocache at an ancient site, then I suggest they take it away or throw it into the bushes away from the site. Geocachers won't mind. They are not precious about their little boxes and finding (or not finding) well hidden caches is all part of the fun.
hahahahahahahahaha

in my experience geocachers have *NO* sense of humour about this.

furthermore, this practise of "throwing it into the bushes" could encourage them to dig deeper.

Much better to report it to their own bosses to sort out. some of them appear to give a damn and tend to encourage lesser shits to behave, where appropriate. Their own rules say they shouldn't compromise sites of special interest, whether they be standing stones or birds nests.

rocknicker wrote:
hahahahahahahahaha

in my experience geocachers have *NO* sense of humour about this.

Well just too bad for them. They get there, no findee box, what do they do? Have a tantrum and start re-adjusting the monuments. Maybe. Probably just enjoy the scenery, munch their sandwich and move on (to the next cache).

I am thinking about remote upland sort of places here. If ramblers start to build a small walker's cairn on the top of a Bronze Age mountain top cairn (as they do) and whatisthat comes along and boots it down - who cares? Same for geos surely.

What is geo wanking anyway? :~)