close
more_vert

I don't think you've addressed my point, which is that his conclusions don't follow from the literature he cites. I call that fluffy thinking. What do you call it?

I don't agree with you that, "...his conclusions don't follow from the literature he cites." His conclusions (in the main) do follow from the literature he cites, plus a considerable amount of his own fieldwork; I call that sound research - no doubt you will continue to call it fluffy and no doubt we are beginning to bore the rest of the Forum with this exchange.