Rhiannon wrote:
I'll be locking this thread in a minute. It is mine and was not intended for ARGUMENT it was supposed to be a generous offer of free literature.
Argument? You seem to be confusing the idea of 'argument' with the idea of 'questioning' Rhiannon. You described Dames' book as 'fluffy' and I questioned why you should use that word. Instead of replying with a rational explanation of what you think 'fluffiness' is you reply with comments such as 'my' book and 'my' thread as if this somehow explains your description of Dames' writings.
Perhaps, before you lock 'your' thread, you would like to explain why you think Dames book is, actually, so 'fluffy'?
