no controversy for its own sake! honest ,it just seems a tad unfortunate that in these days of double speak and division we have proponents of double speak and division on the other side of the fence as well, surely when we are in a position (as modern statistics and surveys prove eg recent stats in violence :against people: 4.7 male 4.7 female) as we are now to look at the problems we encounter by being sundered and alienated from intrinsic aspects of our nature we alienate the other half of our nature/species by playing the post fem card (please it is outdated disproved and divisive.If there are individuals who are so damaged they cannot or will not interact in a positive manner with the other sex then by all means offer them enviroments where they fell safe!! great but to exclusively pander to this as if it is other than damage or abheration is delusional at its best and a crude form of victimhood equalling abdication of responsibillity at worst!! is it these ideas and mythologic structures/interpretations that caused damn good forward thinking feminists like Erin pizzey (author of prone to violence) to flee the country, there again i could be wrong, but how do i know without a honest answer?