Thanks for the clarification StoneLifter. The disputed antiquity flag and accompanying post have now been removed. Perhaps you could add some more detail to your Miscellaneous post to put Lintley in context.
On TMA the onus is very much on the person who has posted a site to qualify its inclusion (this is clearly stated in the Submission Guidelines). Ideally we'd like this to be done in the form of a textual post (ie. Fieldnotes or Misc.).
Purely as a safeguard, us Eds check to see whether or not a site falls within the period covered by TMA. We only have to do this because a reasonable number of sites get added to TMA when they're not relevant (eg. not old enough) or ambiguous and poorly documented.
We don't have the resources to do detailed research into every problematic site that is posted on TMA. If there's reasonable cause for doubt we will either contact the postee, add the disputed antiquity flag or in some cases simply remove the site.
If you know of a link to the relevant SMR for Lintley, please feel free to post it on the site. The clearer things are, the better for everyone.
TMA Ed