Ritual

close
more_vert

I was interested in whether or not you considered 'sacred' rate it's useage/validity in a subjective fashion.

For instance, you infer that such a statement "all life is sacred" to be a meaningless comment in relation to the word 'sacred'.

So if Buddhists (for example) lead a life based upon the principle that 'all life is sacred', then their life is 'inherently meaningless' because they have gotten the concept of 'sacred' wrong?

Confused as ever!

I cut a large chunk of unintelligible garbage out of that last post, and then some..!

Should have read:

"I was interested in whether or not you considered 'sacred', as you tend to rate it's useage/validity in a subjective fashion."

No. Its meaningful to them ( the Buddhists), but meaningless to me. Everything depends on perspective unless you believe in absolute truths. Individually or in groups, we attempt to make sense of life, the universe and everything. We set up taboos, we create the sacred, we create our gods - in my opinion. Perhaps you believe that sacredness is inherent in places and objects and we come to recognise that by revelation or instruction. If so, I can respect your view, but not share it.

To Buddhists, all life is sacred and so they do not take life. There are even extreme Buddhist sects who wear face marks so that they don't kill airborne microscopic life by inhaling it. Is that an absolute truth that the rest of us must subscribe to? Is it even possible?

A Christian regards wafers and wine as the sacred body and blood of Christ. To me its just wafers and wine. Not sure that I have much more to say on this.