TMA Eds — DA Status Needed​…

close
more_vert
Paulus P
Paulus Dec 9, 2005 21:05:51
Replying to PeterH

This thread is primarily about deleting crap or non-existent sites with no archaeocentric validity - and not about restricting the types of sites on TMA. Thankfully we've got a very broad selection of site-material from which TMA can draw upon, including holy wells, hill-figures, labyrinths, etc. And I assume it's gonne be kept that way.

< Doesn't affect me as my main interest lies in Holy Wells and the early medieval and so I post my photos elsewhere. >

Yeah, I've noticed. Considering that you have so much to say, it's odd that you aint put a single item on this site. Why's that?

S StoneLifter
StoneLifter Dec 9, 2005 21:34:10
Replying to Paulus

The cat can call the kettle - "I think you need to get out more and maybe meet some new people and hear some different viewpoints". I beat your thirty years experience by a good decade and consider your opinion on the stones to be shite. It's true I've never written a book on the subject but, if I had, I would expect it to have a circulation of more than three. I consider you as a Thurse - which someone will possibly define. Please pipe down and let the more reflective souls get a word in edgeways ...

P PeterH
PeterH Dec 9, 2005 22:04:47
Replying to Paulus

I'll not respond to your rudeness, Paulus. I post my photos where I choose to and allow you that same freedom. My material, however unworthy, is at least original and not in constant breach of copyright law

P PeterH
PeterH Dec 9, 2005 22:20:08
Replying to Paulus

"Yeah, I've noticed. Considering that you have so much to say, it's odd that you aint put a single item on this site. Why's that?"

Wrong again Paulus - I have added 28 sites, 70 photographs and 60 field notes to TMA. Not much I know and that was under a pseudonym. Prefer to use my own name now.

L Littlestone
Littlestone Dec 9, 2005 22:20:54
Replying to Paulus

>Considering that you have so much to say, it's odd that you aint put a single item on this site. Why's that?<

A quick scroll through the last fifty or so posts on TMA show the following by Peter -

Red horse of Tysoe
Dare I?
Shh
Locked out
Icon of England
Threats to American sites

Not to mention the countless valuable and informative contributions Peter has made to other people's posts. Perhaps I'm missing something here so I'd really appreciate a more detailed explanation of your above statement (or its retraction).