close
more_vert

Hi Wolf -
That stone was first catalogued in John Hedges Rombald's Moor survey as stone 138, then in PRAWR as stone 298, with them asking, "perhaps recent?"

...nearly forgot - OS reference to the stone SE 12998 46314. And shouldn't we give it its own entry, as it's not the Haystack...?

Hi Paulus,

i thought it strange that there could be a rock with 3 cups on it so close to the Haystack and it not have its own site. What is the overall opinion?..more modern?.also i did notice chalk marks around one of the cups.

WNH