close
more_vert

Really wish there were clear guidelines on publishing, electronically or otherwise, older texts and illustrations (perhaps there are). Paulus' recent posts of early illustrations of Avebury and other places for example are fascinating but who, if anyone, holds the copyright on these illustrations?

The early images are free of copyright. Owt more than 60yrs (or has it changed?) is out of copyright. If items are clearly labelled and referenced as being from the original source - which is occurring more and more in literary sources - copyright infringement is avoided. If you can find any image I might have posted without such attributes, point it out to me & I'll either remedy the situation or delete it if necessary.

Copyright is clear. You are breaking copyright law if you copy text or drawings within 70 years of the writer or artist's death. If the author/artist has been dead for 70 years and if you own the original publication or drawing then you have no problem. You do have a problem if you are copying a reproduction in a modern publication because the author of that publication has paid copyright dues for permission to reproduce the original and you are therefore in breach of the copyrigtt of the modern publication. Original document/ drawings etc are owned by indivuiduals and museums and they may grant you permission to photogroph them and reproduce. If you are copying someone else's photograph of an original then you are in breach of that photographer's copyright.

In Britain, we do have an understanding of fair copying which relates to a very small part of a document for educational or study purposes - that would be perfectly acceptable for a websitelike TMA. Copying the whole of a drawing is not allowed.

OK - you might get away with it, but the short answer is that it is THEFT.