Hi Wideford​…

close
more_vert

Yes, stone is continually recycled and there is no reason why a glacial erratic erected as a standing stone four and a half thousand years ago shouldn't be refaced and reused as a gatepost more recently. Is it a gatepost now or a former standing stone ? What about the pairs of standing stones (Burl calls them a type 'a' Stone Row) that have just been drilled for hinges and have had a hedge planted up and down from them ? Are they standing stones, gateposts or a small stone row ? (These are rhetorical questions).

I've got loads of these kind of stones in Smithills, both upright and fallen - I posted some of them, then there were substantial objections (I'd called the most bulbous one the Bo Stone or something) and I pulled them out. Boundary stones are often ancient simply as the boundaries are also ancient.

Ermm.

I'm not arguing with all that! It's proof of likelihood that I'm asking for.

It's not enough to say, "I believe this stone is ancient, so I'm posting it". You have to make at least an attempt to proof what you're saying (or 'one' is saying) might be correct.

K x