CianMcLiam

close
more_vert

Thanks Peter H, the subjects are usually breathtaking, as is getting to them! Not sure I'm getting that across as much as I would like though.

Adams certainly gets across what it 'feels' like to be there and this is what I hope to be able to do in time. Showing what something looks like is taking a good photo, showing what it feels like is very challenging and I guess thats why I like taking photos and being creative in the attempt.

If I was trying to show what something looks like then I would accept it as criticism for enhancing or modifying but I'm trying to do something different so the 'enhancing' is as much a part of it as taking the picture in the first place. But at the end of the day I dont do an awful lot of modifying in photoshop, I dont add anything, like skies from another picture, and I try not to remove anything unless its a strong distraction. I do try and add mood by tinkering with the exposure (before taking the picture), contrast curve and correcting any colour imbalance caused by the camera. The only filters I use are a polariser (very occasionally) and a ND grad grey to try and keep some detail in the sky without changing its colour. The Nikon D70 I use has a superb metering and flash system which helps enormously.

I do vary my style but not really for the sake of variety, it depends on the place and the picture. Some look better in B&W and some with deep colours, I just try to make a picture that translates what I saw and felt in a particular place so I think it can take a different interpretation from someone who wasn't there at that time and place.

That's what its all about isn't it? We take most photos for the record, but the special ones have to be felt.
My great hero, the incredible Karsh said "To make enduring photographs, one must learn to see with the mind's eye, for the heart and the mind are the true lens of the camera."