Yes, I stand by that. Your online article is far more detailed and informative and, personally, I would have preferred to see that reproduced in the magazine rather than space-consuming photos of wax seals and Victorian coins .

I thought it obvious to put more information on the website (you can never satisfy everyone) and the seals very interesting. Having seen the originals during the period they were 'lost' I noticed that they were all different. Were they perhaps part of a Victorian classical revival set - anyone have any ideas?