Pagans

close
more_vert
Kozmik_Ken K
Kozmik_Ken Jul 20, 2004 09:28:20
Replying to Mr Hamhead

Didn't think it was too bad at all. Was glad it wasn't some tabloidy exposé of modern paganism.

Only crit I'd make is that it could have gone even further back and examined totemism in the Neolithic... animal bones in long barrows etc.

But overall, pretty good really.... didn't think we needed to see him feeding rabbits to caged wolves tho'!

F FourWinds
FourWinds Jul 20, 2004 09:31:15
Replying to Kozmik_Ken

I sat down last night, looked at my watch and thought, "Bollocks!". It was five past ten. Missed it.

K Kozmik_Ken
Kozmik_Ken Jul 20, 2004 09:40:36
Replying to Kozmik_Ken

Oh yes... also thought that shamanistic animal transformation could have been covered too. Rock art of flying bucks etc from the last 30 odd thousand years would have made a good sequence, rather than repeated showings of the same clips over n' over (something I've noticed in anthropology/history docs in the last few years... stretch out a few seconds of footage in slow mo again n' again).

M Moth
Moth Jul 21, 2004 09:13:21
Replying to Kozmik_Ken

We figured/hoped that the (main) reason it didn't go back further was that it was concentrating on contrast against the rise of chr*stianity. Shame tho!!!!

love

Moth