> Do you mean factual errors or just plain mis-
> interpretations/silly-ideas?

A bit of both I guess, but mostly the latter. It's noticeable when I read about the Welsh sites, 'cos that's what I know best. Mainly minor stuff though.

> For factual errors, just imagine how much fun they've
> had proof-reading the Megalithic European ...

Did they proof-read TMA?

;-)#

K