close

This is the title i have been given for an essay and was wondering what peoples views are. Obviously it does but what do you all consider your selves to be and who or what is a modern antiquarian. This may seem like an easy way out but your opinions would be appricated as I can't seem to find much literature on this particular subject.
Cheers very much
Hayley

Can I first of all say what an honour it is to be the subject of an essay.

Unfortunately, this question's too hard for me.

Any ideas anyone?!

How many marks are we worth?

.o0O0o.

In terms of the titled gentleman/vicar/landowner getting on his horse with a team miners to dig three barrows in a day then, no, antiquarianism does not exist.

BUT has the active physical digging aspect been replaced by amateurs (like those on TMA, the stones list etc) who undertake research for the love of it (some of it that does get published but believe me it doesn't cover costs, but hey it's a hobby). Some research is 'blue sky thinking' but it may trigger 'serious' (academic) study.

Can I be the first to coin 'e-antiquarianism'?! The internet is the biggest step forward in antiquarianism since the spade.

Cheers

Grendel

antiquariism eh?
I would like to think I am a modern day Antiquarian.
I am interested in the Antiquities of these lands and document as much as my limited funds allow.
You can call me a Cyber-Antiquariist if you like!
Pete G

I think so, after a fashion. It's certainly not the antiquarian of the past (the gentlemen/vicar type as someone has mentioned), but the MODERN antiquarian def does exist, people are interested in exploring the ancient cultural heritage of the country and it makes an absorbing and addictive hobby! Looking at this web community alone speaks volumes and illustrates how many folks are spending their free time exploring the subject. I would stick my hand in the air and declare that I am a modern antiquarian.

WF

Most of the original antiquarians were little more than middle class treasure hunters. With a few notable exception their interest in the sites they dug revolved around finding grave goods. They chucked a lot of real treasure on the spoil heap (bones, ashes, pottery) in a frenzy to find something shiny that they could put on display somewhere. They wouldn't have seen it that way themselves of course. They saw it as an effective pursuit of knowledge.

To my mind Modern Antiquarianism shares very little with it's namesake. The ethos behind it (even for a train spotter like Fourwinds) is very different. Visiting a site is the focus, and nothing (but litter) is taken away. Only the fanaticism of the participants and the amateur nature of the pastime are qualities shared with the original tump diggers.

I agree with Pebblesfromheaven when she says the metaldetectorists are the closest we get to it now. Like the original antiquarians they think they destroy as much as they find. They don't see it that way themselves of course. They see it as an effective pursuit of knowledge.

Another thing to think about is the picture outside the UK, where forms of treasure hunting similar to antiquarianism are no doubt still be taking place.

K x

These may help...

Monuments and texts: Antiquarianism and the beauty of antiquity
Lolla MG
ART HISTORY
25 (4): 431-449 SEP 2002.

Antiquity and improvement in the national landscape: The Bucks' views of antiquities 1726-42
Kennedy A ART HISTORY
25 (4): 488-499 SEP 2002.

Every man is naturally an antiquarian: Francis Grose and polite antiquities
Bending F
ART HISTORY
25 (4): 520-530 SEP 2002.

The notability and the study of antiquity: the inclusion of local scholars amongst the urban elite of northern France in the 19th century
Parsis-Barube O
REVUE DU NORD
81 (332): 797-815 OCT-DEC 1999 - in French though...

I reckon you should just argue that it 'never' existed!

xxx Buck.

cheers guys and girls for all the ideas and info. After alot of book, journal and web delving and an extenstion i've finally handed in a resonable essay.
thanks again
hayley.
ps i didn't repeat the spelling error in the essay.