Getting Serious about Conservation

Moth M
Moth Nov 5, 2003 15:45:58
Replying to Jane

This is where ES's setting parameters first would have its advantages!!!

Nigel wasn't sure whether he wanted to limit it to 'our' stuff.

I think we should, personally - it's what we're all interested in and the stuff that seems to me most often abused.

love

Moth

J Jane
Jane Nov 5, 2003 15:53:25
Replying to Moth

Yes, of course it should be limited to 'our' stuff... I thought that was implicit in the original post.

I would certainly risk arrest for protesting about the destruction of Thornborough, but I certainly wouldn't for some tedious 19th century narrow gauge branch line station building. Both are our heritage, though which is why we have to use the word Ancient or Prehistoric, IMHO.
J
x

N nigelswift
nigelswift Nov 5, 2003 15:56:50
Replying to Moth

I'm only interested in "our" stuff as well, I was just thinking 20 years ahead :) when it's the focus for all Conservation :) :) ....
It might be good to have a catch-all name, even though for now it's just concerned with ancient stuff. Links are so good for driving traffic and alerting Google. But I really don't have any strong feelings on the subject. If most people prefer to include Ancient etc that's fine by me.

"Action" is very good. Neatly sets the agenda.

© 2026 Head Heritage.

Unless otherwise stated, the copyright in each work is the property of the respective contributor. For usage or questions, contact [email protected].