close
more_vert

Forgive the swearing but I bloody did invent the term!! Ask the old timers on the Stones Mailing List.

For the record, here's my response, minus the unnecessarily rude front bit that I'm sure FourWinds will delight in quoting for me.

He doesn't understand what a megarak is, so allow me:

The term was based not in trainspotting but in Offshore Radio of the 1960s to 1980s, the latter times of which I was quite heavily involved. I don't know any trainspotters so I can't speak for them.

To learn more, go to the quite excellent
http://www.anoraknation.com , specifically
What is an anorak?
http://www.anoraknation.com /knowledge/free_radio/000002.html

It's popular misconception that the 'anorak' is not a spiritual creature. Anoraks follow the concept of 'Loving Awareness' propogated by Radio Caroline
http://www.anoraknation.com /knowledge/radio_caroline/000006.html

Similarly, the concept of a megarak is based deeply in emotions and connectedness, if not 'spirituality' per se. Speaking for myself as coiner of the term, and thus the founding megarak:

Megaraks are fascinated by the connection between ancient and modern technology. Megalithic sites and artefacts such as the gold cup on TV this evening (excellent program I thought BTW - they have redeemed themselves in my book) are evidence of the first technology. We are the same people that created that technology. I'm sure their technology was intertwined with 'magic'. The best of ours is too. Their sites vied with each other for their clever design and grew more sophisticated over time. There's a parallel there.

Megaraks are inclusive. We are deeply interested in modern forms of stone-circlery and paganism even if we don't necessarily go off dressing up in cloaks and waving our arms around, as we are usually quiet people.

We are tolerant of alternative views and other users of the countryside (with the exception of the 4x4 offroad driving fraternity!). We are intolerant of idolatry, cliques and intolerant people.

We deeply object to the ingrained term 'Monuments' (notice I never EVER use that word) and would like it struck from the terminology. We are also very sceptical about 'Heritage', my second least favourite word. What does this tell you about our belief in the subject's connectedness with the present?

I've heard and read Michael Dames and I find him the least convincing of the serious 'Earth Mysteries' writers. Like a lot of things, megaraks were a spinoff from the 'Ley Hunter' magazine (which was mostly not about Ley Lines, or Hunting them - don't let's start on that one again).

Megaraks most want people to respect and inform themselves about ancient sites. This is our primary purpose. Yes we like to observe and record, this is true, but out of our desire to pass on information to others, and not to change the site, but let the site change us.

Given all the above, it should be clear that the Stones Mailing List is the true home of the Megarak. This is where the word was born. I'm especially tickled to see it passing seriously into the language. Next stop the Oxford English Dictionary!

The only bit Tombo gets right is that a megarak is someone with an ironic sense of humour.

The people Tombo derides are actually called Pokemonolithiacs (gotta catch 'em all) and we love them as well. Come on people, help us 'catch' them all!

Andy
http://www.megalithic.co.uk

Don't worry, I've already read the rude bit... I have eyes everywhere (though I don't subscribe to your mailing list). I wondered if you'd actually say it to my face or not.

What I wrote was from the heart and it's how I feel, so I stand by it. It seems to me that the skeptics are allowed to say what the hell they want and that no-one ever really fights back with the same force. Take Michael Dames. People go on as if he should never have bothered writing those books. I could list a thousand insensitive, hurtful remarks that have been directed his way on this forum: "woven from a fabric of utter bollocks", "belongs in the comedy section" to name but two (sorry FW, I have to say it though). Yet that's just one point of view (although one that remains largely unchallenged in this place). From my point of view those books contain so much vision and sheer <i>engagement</i> with the landscape and monuments (Andy - why don't you like this term? - I have even less understanding of what you've got against the word "heritage") that they are of immense worth. I feel for anyone who reveals their most out-there visions to the world only to be met with scorn and derision. I feel for anyone who spends time and effort researching and writing a book (whatever you think of Dames you can't deny that he's done his fieldwork) only for people to call him a madman.

So I don't understand what a Megarak is? You remind me of Humpty-Dumpty in <i>Alice in Wonderland</i>: "words mean what I say they mean". All I know is that it's the word <i>megalith</i> combined with the word <i>anorak</i>. Isn't that true? <i>Anorak</i> might mean something else entirely to you but to most of the rest of the world it is both an insult and a reference to trainspotting. I'm not going to get into morality of deriding trainspotters - the fact is that this is widely understood to be a boring and obsessive pastime, rightly or wrongly. Given this, the word megarak means, to those who know nothing of megaraks or megaliths, "anorak" or "nerd" or somesuch. A big part of what I was saying is "don't call me a megarak". I don't want to be thought of as one and its my right to say this if I so choose, surely? I deny your label.

As for my caricature of what a Megarak is, I'm quite happy to admit that it was just that - a caricature (ie. a deliberately exaggerated and distorted portrait). My intent was to make people question, to think twice about what they're visiting monuments for in the first place. The fact that it's generated all this discussion, both here and on your stones mailing list, only serves to show that my writing has been successful in its goal - not bad for a load of "rambling twaddle" (told you I'd read it). When people get so put-out I have to ask myself - have I touched a nerve? Is the truth uncomfortable? If what I said was simply a load of crap without any truth in it then you'd all have just ignored it, after all.

continued...