DOWSING

close
more_vert

Good worms. Nothing is provable, all may be illusion. So, for working purposes only, let’s say we exist and at least some of science is truth. On that basis, neither the rest of science nor the paranormal are provable by the bit of science we’re arbitrarily choosing to rely upon, and are thus of equal status, unprovable.
So a scientist has no right to say the whole universe is governed by the laws of physics. Much of it may be held together by mystical ley lines, how would he know?

Is a word that turns people off, because A: It has been used and abused for years by charlatans and religious nuts as an attempt to keep people in awe whilst sleight of hand did it's dirty work (hmm, sounds like politics and big business). And B: It's etymologically bound to 'mystery', which has negative connotations in the current climate of thought. I refer the gentleman to 'Anam Cara' by John O' Donohue, a work which although abhorrent to many who would say that it lacks hard science, nevertheless, at the very least, it illuminates the better sides of the 'spiritual' experience and places it in context in a modern world that illumines everything by flourescent light saying that 'THAT' is the way to view things. Science can take forever ever to tell us how to think, whilst we forget about *being*.

I refuse to live in a black and white world when people are telling me to, especially when there's so much delicious vibrant colour and shadow in the human experience of the natural world.