close
more_vert

Access details such as terrain (rocky, grassy. beaten earth, tarmac etc), slope, distance, gates, steps and other obstacles, nearby parking (essential) are more use that a Yes/No system which is too simplistic.
We know that the Ancients did not always think of access for disabled people when planning sites! These days people have become a bit more inclusive, we hope.

Thanks for all the thought that people are putting into this, this is the way that society should be...

Hmmm, I've been thinking about it too. I can see that the descriptive approach would be far more useful to a wider range of people for who access is not straightforward. It puts the 'decision' with the person themself, rather than making a potentially flawed judgement 'on their behalf'.

I often try to make my instructions on how to get to sites quite detailed esp if nobody else has already posted detailed instructions here. I guess I may have inadvertantly given clues on some occasions, but I have to say that I've never thought about disabled access to sites so far.

I'll be trying to remember to give it a go when I next write fieldnotes - which will be before long!!

love

Moth