close
more_vert

Beware of photoshop and it's ilk, it's great for doing basic lightroom stuff (the light equivalent of the traditional dakroom), or creating works from scratch, but I've seen so many photos ruined by judicious filters and bad colour management. I think a lightroom is far less bad chemicals, and far less workspace, so it works for me, being a control freak and having a 5x3 ft area available to work in!

Regarding priners, an A3 photo printer isn't too expensive, or do what I sometimes do and find a lab with a Fuji Frontier printer, which will give you 'traditional' prints from your own CDR. I'm in the business of producing fine art prints, and as such am incredibly picky, but the Fuji lab do a 90% faithful job on images, which is more than good enough for non-limited editions.

Hope this helps

morfegeek :-)

This digital stuff is all very well, but as I've said before, you lose skill and craftswomanship if you wander out and knock off any old pic because you can doctor it up on the computer at a later date.

I once saw the work of a photographer who'd done exactly that; he'd taken some poorly composed, and quite frankly, shite pictures, saying 'Oh it doesn't matter, I can do something in Photoshop with it later'. Whatever happened to standards? Eh? Eh???

I like the challenge of crafting something from what's in front of me; and if I produced a wonderful shot every time, where would the joy be? I accept the comments about chemistry-free atmospheres, but if you have adequate ventilation, this shouldn't be too much of a problem (and I'm hooked on the smell of darkrooms; feels like coming home to me). I like crafting my own prints with an enlarger. I can 'feel' what I'm doing, much like making custard. Any cook will tell you that you need to 'feel' the dish to see if it's right or not. I'm sure the Cheese Empress (Rhiannon) would agree with me on that one!

And it wasn't a digital SLR, it was one of those small square things.

Yours,

An old stick-in-the-treacle xx