Ritual Landscapes

close
more_vert

I *never* see such imagery in the landscape.....until it`s pointed out to me.

If I were to see two lovely, curvy, rounded, soft, squishy, suckable....errr, hills, I`m more likely to think `oh, two very similar hills`, rather than `tits!`.

I am aware that others see things differently, obviously because many hills *are* named after tits.

Which makes me think....do men in all cultures think the same about tits? What I`m thinking off is those tribes in warmer climes, where few clothes are worn. Tits are flopping about all over the place....do men in such societies still oggle after them and want to get there hands on them all?
I don`t know, perhaps they weren`t regarded in such a sexual way in prehistory.

baz

Depends what you mean by 'sexual'. When I saw Whimble Hill and Bache hill, I saw a fecund sexuality, a pregnancy, which isn't at all modern or 'voyeur' centric, that fecundity is as timeless as ever?

... I can appreciate your apprehension about religion, but I'll not have talk like that about tits!

Shut up Baz. I always end up looking like your 'yes' man.

love

Moth

PS I didn't mean it about the 'boring' thing.