Sacred Landscapes

close
more_vert

I think the difference is faith or belief.

The most "wrong" group to me are the catholic church. Only when it is forced upon society does it really become wrong.

I suppose you would ban Santa Claus as it meets most of the criteria you set out. Children are therefore "wrong"

The comic answer to the Santa Claus thing is 'yes, ban the old git'

But the serious answer is, hang on a minute, no-one has mentioned banning anything. No one has mentioned, or even hinted at anytime of action or discrimination against people's beliefs. merely some of us have said that our belief in the 'wrongness' of their belief (or on the wider level - our belief in no belief) is as equally valid as their belief in something.

The trouble is, that by arguing very seriously, strongly and passionately against something, your point of view often gets taken less seriously (as if you are merely spoiling their ideas for fun) especially when your belief is a lack of belief, which is never going to be as sexy as believe in an idol / a book of writings / a set of beliefs etc.

'The most "wrong" group to me are the catholic church.'

Surely wrong is wrong if talking about 'wrong' as in 'incorrect'? (I wouldn't disagree with the sentiment though.)

'Only when it is forced upon society does it really become wrong.'

Have you moved from 'incorrect' to morally 'wrong'?

'I suppose you would ban Santa Claus as it meets most of the criteria you set out. Children are therefore "wrong".'

I'm very confused now. Yes, they're 'wrong' as in incorrect. Santa doesn't exist (sorry all). They're not morally wrong though....

love

Moth