Forums | Re: Stonehenge wasn't first second hand monument

The Modern Antiquarian

Home	Latest Posts	Forums	Maps	Help

Browse Sites	News	Blog	Contributors	The Books

Head To Head

The Modern Antiquarian

Stonehenge Forum

Start a topic | Search

Stonehenge

Re: Stonehenge wasn't first second hand monument

59 messages

Select a forum:

tiompan wrote:

At one time it was suggested by one geomorphologist that the "proto orthostat " had arrived at it's situation perfectly naturally ,if this was so and it was worth using, then the removal of that rock , or anything similar , to a distance anywhere from 100 metres to 150 miles would never have been noticed by the three g/g's .

An extremely good point and one which should give pause for thought.
In fact, observations of a similar nature very obviously did, and the censorship driven by aforementioned hubris put an end to any reasonable discussion on that blog site.

Reply | with quote

Posted by Evergreen Dazed
15th December 2015ce
14:09

In reply to:

Re: Stonehenge wasn't first second hand monument (tiompan)

Messages in this topic:

Stonehenge is second hand

(nigelswift, Dec 07, 2015, 08:55)

Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 07, 2015, 09:34)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (nigelswift, Dec 07, 2015, 09:48)
  - Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 07, 2015, 09:55)
    - Re: Stonehenge is second hand (nigelswift, Dec 07, 2015, 10:09)
      - Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 07, 2015, 10:42)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (nigelswift, Dec 07, 2015, 13:39)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tomatoman, Dec 07, 2015, 16:42)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 07, 2015, 17:31)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (nigelswift, Dec 07, 2015, 20:32)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 07, 2015, 20:57)
Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Monganaut, Dec 07, 2015, 20:11)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 07, 2015, 21:06)
  - Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Monganaut, Dec 07, 2015, 21:42)
    - Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 07, 2015, 22:13)
      - Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Monganaut, Dec 07, 2015, 22:21)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 07, 2015, 22:36)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Monganaut, Dec 07, 2015, 23:22)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 07, 2015, 23:41)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Monganaut, Dec 07, 2015, 23:50)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 08, 2015, 08:24)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Evergreen Dazed, Dec 07, 2015, 23:51)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Monganaut, Dec 08, 2015, 00:09)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Evergreen Dazed, Dec 08, 2015, 00:20)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Evergreen Dazed, Dec 08, 2015, 00:28)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Monganaut, Dec 08, 2015, 00:53)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Evergreen Dazed, Dec 08, 2015, 07:55)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (moss, Dec 08, 2015, 07:59)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Evergreen Dazed, Dec 08, 2015, 07:59)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 08, 2015, 08:31)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Monganaut, Dec 08, 2015, 20:25)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 08, 2015, 20:46)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Monganaut, Dec 08, 2015, 22:05)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 08, 2015, 22:34)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Evergreen Dazed, Dec 09, 2015, 00:02)
Re: Stonehenge is second hand (goffik, Dec 08, 2015, 13:55)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tomatoman, Dec 08, 2015, 14:19)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Evergreen Dazed, Dec 08, 2015, 15:53)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (BigSweetie, Dec 08, 2015, 17:26)
  - Re: Stonehenge is second hand (goffik, Dec 09, 2015, 09:34)
Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tjj, Dec 09, 2015, 10:00)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 09, 2015, 10:27)
  - Re: Stonehenge is second hand (nigelswift, Dec 09, 2015, 11:34)
    - Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 09, 2015, 18:29)
  - Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tjj, Dec 10, 2015, 08:41)
    - Re: Stonehenge is second hand (mountainman, Dec 12, 2015, 10:59)
      - Re: Stonehenge is second hand (cerrig, Dec 12, 2015, 11:54)
      - Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Evergreen Dazed, Dec 13, 2015, 14:21)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Evergreen Dazed, Dec 14, 2015, 17:36)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (nigelswift, Dec 14, 2015, 18:00)
        Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Evergreen Dazed, Dec 14, 2015, 21:42)
      - Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 15, 2015, 00:40)
Stonehenge wasn't first second hand monument (thesweetcheat, Dec 12, 2015, 13:33)
- Re: Stonehenge wasn't first second hand monument (Sanctuary, Dec 12, 2015, 14:28)
- Re: Stonehenge wasn't first second hand monument (moss, Dec 13, 2015, 09:19)
  - Re: Stonehenge wasn't first second hand monument (tomatoman, Dec 13, 2015, 16:38)
    - Re: Stonehenge wasn't first second hand monument (nigelswift, Dec 14, 2015, 10:02)
      - Re: Stonehenge wasn't first second hand monument (tiompan, Dec 15, 2015, 01:04)
        Re: Stonehenge wasn't first second hand monument (Evergreen Dazed, Dec 15, 2015, 14:09)

Terms & Conditions | Home | Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Top of page