The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian
Home Latest Posts Forums Maps Help
Browse Sites News Blog Contributors The Books
Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   Stonehenge Forum Start a topic | Search
Stonehenge
Re: Stonehenge is second hand
59 messages
Select a forum:
I'm disappointed to have to read 'the probable date for the extraction from the recess' and then realise the dates come from the Neolithic occupation layer.
It's disingenuous, at best.
Whilst I obviously love the subject, appreciate the effort, experience and passion of the archaeologists involved, and I excitedly consume the reports and enjoy the discussion, I could do with a great deal more objectivity from those involved to help me, the lowly punter, really understand why two small blocks under a large recumbent near a rock face are any indication of removal of that rock for potential transport to SH.
There is a lot of mist, shall we say.


Reply | with quote
Evergreen Dazed
Posted by Evergreen Dazed
8th December 2015ce
00:20

In reply to:

Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Monganaut)

1 reply:

Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Evergreen Dazed)

Messages in this topic:

Terms & Conditions  |  Home  |  Julian Cope presents Head Heritage Top of page