Evergreen Dazed wrote:
Totally agree, pointless to put in a perimeter path that still creates a feeling of distance.
I'm not so sure. I always feel Silbury Hill is quite a difficult monument to engage with, and the idea of a circular path at a distance really appeals. At the moment, there's no real access, and no way to approach the monument. I think if you provide people with SOME way of approaching it and interacting with it, it will reduce the perceived need for climbing the hill. But this is all speculative, and we'll never really know what approach is the best one until something is actually tried.
Reply | with quote | Posted by Mustard 9th January 2013ce 16:41 |
Silbury Hill trespassers (Littlestone, Jan 07, 2013, 09:49)- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Harryshill, Jan 07, 2013, 10:30)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Evergreen Dazed, Jan 07, 2013, 11:03)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Harryshill, Jan 07, 2013, 11:15)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (bladup, Jan 07, 2013, 11:37)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Littlestone, Jan 07, 2013, 14:50)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (harestonesdown, Jan 11, 2013, 20:42)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (VBB, Jan 12, 2013, 07:30)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Sanctuary, Jan 12, 2013, 07:48)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (nigelswift, Jan 12, 2013, 08:08)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Sanctuary, Jan 12, 2013, 08:53)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (nigelswift, Jan 12, 2013, 09:19)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Harryshill, Jan 12, 2013, 09:42)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Sanctuary, Jan 12, 2013, 09:55)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (tjj, Jan 12, 2013, 09:58)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (harestonesdown, Jan 12, 2013, 12:55)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (harestonesdown, Jan 12, 2013, 12:42)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (harestonesdown, Jan 12, 2013, 12:49)
- Re: Silbury Hill...what's that? (Sanctuary, Jan 07, 2013, 19:47)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (tjj, Jan 07, 2013, 22:32)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Sanctuary, Jan 08, 2013, 21:17)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (VBB, Jan 09, 2013, 09:20)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Sanctuary, Jan 09, 2013, 09:56)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (nigelswift, Jan 09, 2013, 10:13)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (VBB, Jan 09, 2013, 10:15)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Harryshill, Jan 09, 2013, 10:23)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (bladup, Jan 09, 2013, 11:09)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Harryshill, Jan 09, 2013, 12:20)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (CARL, Jan 09, 2013, 14:13)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (goffik, Jan 09, 2013, 14:27)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Littlestone, Jan 09, 2013, 14:35)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Evergreen Dazed, Jan 09, 2013, 15:00)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Littlestone, Jan 09, 2013, 15:10)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Sanctuary, Jan 09, 2013, 15:26)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (nigelswift, Jan 09, 2013, 15:37)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Sanctuary, Jan 09, 2013, 15:43)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Evergreen Dazed, Jan 09, 2013, 15:52)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Mustard, Jan 09, 2013, 16:41)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (harestonesdown, Jan 11, 2013, 21:07)
- Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Mustard, Jan 09, 2013, 16:36)
- tma discusses Silbury rationally? (VBB, Jan 09, 2013, 17:25)
- Re: Sponsored signage? (VBB, Jan 11, 2013, 08:23)
- Re: Sponsored signage? (Steve M, Jan 11, 2013, 08:27)
- Re: Sponsored signage? (Sanctuary, Jan 11, 2013, 08:32)
- Re: Sponsored signage? (tjj, Jan 11, 2013, 08:50)
- Re: Sponsored signage? (Littlestone, Jan 11, 2013, 09:02)
- Re: Sponsored signage? (nigelswift, Jan 11, 2013, 09:06)
|
|