The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian

Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   Silbury Hill Forum Start a topic | Search
Silbury Hill
Re: Silbury Hill trespassers
295 messages
Select a forum:
nigelswift wrote:
Harryshill wrote:
This kind of behaviour stinks and I was hoping for something a bit more positive than nothing can be done

Of course it does, but no-one's to blame for the lack of prosecutions as there's no way a single person can be shown in court to have caused damage. It's just the way it is.

On the other hand loads more and better notices would help. EH have a responsibility not to say nothing more can be done until they've done all they can.

Yes but that apart Nigel, what about the trespass, is that not prosecutional? If it's not then all the talk in the world is not going to stop the damage as long as one can walk in and just get on with it. If the hill can't be defended in the courts then it can only be done by secure fencing...and I mean secure, with human presence. It's about time all the talking and excuses stopped. If the Queen owned SH outright they'd son find some way of making it secure!

Reply | with quote
Posted by Sanctuary
7th January 2013ce

In reply to:

Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (nigelswift)

Messages in this topic: