The point I was making was that having spent over half a million pound restoring the Glastonbury tower, NT will now have to spend an unknown amount to undo the damage done by Fathers 4 Justice. This must be disheartening for any organisation, especially a voluntary one.
I am in no way defending the previous NT actions you refer to. In fact I recall personally writing to to NT to object to them allowing mountain bikes to be used on Avebury during the filming of a TV drama.
I very much respect the tireless campaigning Heritage Action have done to protect and properly conserve Silbury Hill. I have ask, however, both Nigel Swift and Littlestone how they would react if F4J pulled a similar stunt on Silbury and undid the work that has currently been undertaken to restore it.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by tjj
3rd October 2007ce
22:41 |
Fathers for justice.. (Rhiannon, Oct 03, 2007, 11:37)- Re: Fathers for justice.. (Mustard, Oct 03, 2007, 11:42)
- Re: Fathers for justice.. (handofdave, Oct 04, 2007, 02:54)
- Re: Fathers for justice.. (Wiggy, Oct 04, 2007, 10:59)
- Re: Fathers for justice.. (scubi63, Oct 04, 2007, 11:51)
- Re: Fathers for justice.. (Cursuswalker, Oct 04, 2007, 17:23)
- Re: Fathers for justice.. (Cursuswalker, Oct 04, 2007, 17:29)
- Re: Fathers for justice.. (nigelswift, Oct 11, 2007, 08:41)
- Re: Fathers for justice.. (neighbourofthedrude, Oct 11, 2007, 13:33)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Fathers for justice.. (Littlestone)