|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian General Discussion Forum | Start a topic | Search |
 Re: Ley Lines 158 messages | Select a forum: |
Robot Emperor wrote: The Sea Cat wrote: Let's hope that one day it may also attempt to get brave and adventurous enough again to investigate beyond it's current circular reasoning which supports a comfortable belief system. What? What do you mean? Don't really see how it can get any more "brave and adventurous" than it already is doing - amongst other things, postulating and attempting to prove the existence of other dimensions, exploring the moment of creation itself, asking what existed before this universe, looking into the hearts of suns and exploded suns - explaining that all living things contain elements that were born in these exploding stars etc etc. It makes all the paranormal phenomenen look dull and prosaic. Fail to see what you are talking about. What is this comfortable belief system? I agree with the particular examples you mention, and I'm deeply interested in Quantum theory myself. So much of it correlates perfectly with ancient Eastern and Hermetic esoteric philosophy, funnily enough. I was referring to the traditional barricade approach to the so called 'paranormal', which to me and many others is far from dull and prosaic. There is a wealth of data and controlled environmental evidence that is rejected, just like the anomalies in the fossil record and instances of archeological knowledge filtration re. the possible antiquity of mankind. In these instances, it seems that if it seriously challenges the prevailing paradigm, it is conveniently buried, so to speak. http://www.suppressedscience.net/archeology.html ps: I am not a creationist, Hindu or otherwise, and I do no not believe in outer space lizards in Parliament, although they'd probably do a better job than the current shower! ; edited re. typos ( again ). Reply | with quote |  13th November 2010ce 08:50 In reply to: Re: Ley Lines (Robot Emperor) |
Messages in this topic: |
|