But that raises too many cross-questions which seem to be ignored. If the Altar was flat, what went in the holes in front of 55 and 56, that have been attributed to the Altar stone all these years?
You know what the problem is? Nobody's bothered to look in case it contradicts established theory, based on bullshit and poor excavation. Nobody wants to stick their neck out in case someone important laughs at them.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by slumpystones
27th February 2007ce
11:23 |
lost stonehenge alter stone (Pete G, Feb 20, 2007, 13:33)- Re: lost stonehenge alter stone (Pete G, Feb 20, 2007, 14:03)
- Re: lost stonehenge alter stone (StoneLifter, Feb 20, 2007, 14:55)
- Re: lost stonehenge alter stone (slumpystones, Feb 20, 2007, 19:52)
- Re: lost stonehenge alter stone (VenerableBottyBurp, Feb 21, 2007, 11:31)
- Re: lost stonehenge alter stone (slumpystones, Feb 21, 2007, 19:51)
- Re: lost stonehenge alter stone (slumpystones, Feb 21, 2007, 22:52)
- Re: lost stonehenge alter stone (Pete G, Feb 23, 2007, 12:34)
- Re: lost stonehenge alter stone (slumpystones, Feb 24, 2007, 15:35)
- Re: lost stonehenge alter stone (tomwatts, Feb 25, 2007, 02:50)
- Re: lost stonehenge alter stone (slumpystones, Feb 25, 2007, 18:29)
- Re: lost stonehenge alter stone (andygreyweather, Feb 25, 2007, 21:47)
- Re: lost stonehenge alter stone (slumpystones, Feb 27, 2007, 10:47)
- Another lost stonehenge stone (Pete G, Feb 27, 2007, 23:20)
- Re: lost stonehenge alter stone (slumpystones, Mar 01, 2007, 10:06)
- Re: have MAGIC lost stonehenge alternative stone? (slumpystones, Mar 09, 2007, 23:56)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: lost stonehenge alter stone (nigelswift)