Forums | Re: mike croley – The Modern Antiquarian.com

The Modern Antiquarian

Home	Latest Posts	Forums	Maps	Help

Browse Sites	News	Blog	Contributors	The Books

Head To Head

U-Know!

Start a topic | Search

Re: mike croley

118 messages

Select a forum:

So... (and you're talking to someone who reads New Scientist every week)...science HAS actually proved all you've said about lizards and so on... they just haven't told us. Is that right?

Now, bearing in mind that UK scientific research is funded almost entirely the the results of the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) which decides on funding according to amount and quality of research published - not just undertaken but published - and that star researchers are like top footballers to their universities in this.... It's a bit odd that nobody has published this epoch-making study.

Don't tell me - it's the Lizards covering everything up again, isn't it.

Doh, dose dwatted wizards...

This topic is locked

Posted by Zastrozzi
6th October 2005ce
21:55

(grimo, Oct 04, 2005, 14:15)

Re: mike croley (grimo, Oct 04, 2005, 16:16)
Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 04, 2005, 21:32)
- Re: mike croley (grimo, Oct 05, 2005, 15:09)
  - Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 05, 2005, 19:46)
    - Re: mike croley (Vybik Jon, Oct 05, 2005, 19:50)
    - Re: mike croley (theotherwindow, Oct 05, 2005, 21:37)
      - Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 06, 2005, 07:34)
    - Re: mike croley (theotherwindow, Oct 05, 2005, 22:07)
      - Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 05, 2005, 22:22)
    - Re: mike croley (joudicaa, Oct 05, 2005, 22:17)
      - Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 05, 2005, 22:32)
        Re: mike croley (Nat, Oct 06, 2005, 10:23)
    - Kundalini Experience (Nat, Oct 06, 2005, 10:13)
      - Kundalini (Nat, Oct 06, 2005, 10:26)
        Re: Kundalini (Vybik Jon, Oct 06, 2005, 10:33)
        Re: Kundalini (Nat, Oct 06, 2005, 10:38)
        Re: Kundalini (Vybik Jon, Oct 06, 2005, 10:45)
        Re: Kundalini (Nat, Oct 06, 2005, 10:47)
        Re: Kundalini (Vybik Jon, Oct 06, 2005, 10:55)
        Re: Kundalini (mike croley, Oct 06, 2005, 18:01)
        Re: Kundalini (Nat, Oct 07, 2005, 09:24)
    - Re: mike croley: "the voice" (grimo, Oct 07, 2005, 07:36)
      - Re: mike croley: "the voice" (Nat, Oct 07, 2005, 09:15)
        Re: mike croley: "the turtle terror" (grimo, Oct 07, 2005, 18:15)
        Re: mike croley: "the turtle terror" (morfe, Oct 07, 2005, 19:55)
      - Re: mike croley: "the voice" (mike croley, Oct 08, 2005, 14:12)
        Re: mike croley: "the voice" (grimo, Oct 08, 2005, 16:50)
        Re: mike croley: "the voice" (sttomas, Oct 08, 2005, 17:44)
        Re: mike croley: "the voice" (grimo, Oct 08, 2005, 19:02)
        Re: mike croley: "the voice" (Rolling Ronnie, Oct 10, 2005, 10:39)
        Re: mike croley: "the voice" (grimo, Oct 10, 2005, 15:17)
        Re: mike croley: "the voice" (mike croley, Oct 08, 2005, 20:39)
        Re: mike croley: "the voice" (grimo, Oct 09, 2005, 05:01)
        Re: mike croley: "the voice" (mike croley, Oct 09, 2005, 17:23)
        Re: mike croley: "the voice" (grimo, Oct 09, 2005, 21:30)
  - Re: mike croley (jb lamptoast-morsley, Oct 06, 2005, 21:00)
- Re: mike croley (sttomas, Oct 07, 2005, 01:29)
  - Re: mike croley (joudicaa, Oct 07, 2005, 01:32)
    - Re: mike croley (sttomas, Oct 07, 2005, 01:38)
      - Re: mike croley (anthonyqkiernan, Oct 07, 2005, 11:16)
  - Re: mike croley (Lubin, Oct 07, 2005, 18:48)
- Re: mike croley (scousemaiden, Oct 08, 2005, 00:37)
  - Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 08, 2005, 11:22)
    - Re: mike croley (scousemaiden, Oct 08, 2005, 16:52)
Re: mike croley (Vybik Jon, Oct 05, 2005, 18:17)
- Re: mike croley (anthonyqkiernan, Oct 05, 2005, 21:57)
Re: mike croley (Ether, Oct 05, 2005, 21:08)
- Re: mike croley (Vybik Jon, Oct 05, 2005, 21:22)
  - Re: mike croley (Vybik Jon, Oct 05, 2005, 21:24)
    - Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 05, 2005, 22:17)
      - Re: mike croley (Vybik Jon, Oct 06, 2005, 10:26)
      - Re: mike croley (jb lamptoast-morsley, Oct 06, 2005, 13:07)
- Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 05, 2005, 22:06)
  - Re: mike croley (morfe, Oct 05, 2005, 22:26)
    - Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 05, 2005, 22:39)
      - Re: mike croley (morfe, Oct 06, 2005, 09:49)
  - Re: mike croley (Ether, Oct 05, 2005, 22:52)
Re: mike croley (Zastrozzi, Oct 05, 2005, 23:33)
- Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 06, 2005, 08:06)
  - Re: mike croley (Zastrozzi, Oct 06, 2005, 09:43)
    - Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 06, 2005, 18:27)
      - Re: mike croley (morfe, Oct 06, 2005, 18:56)
        Re: mike croley (Vybik Jon, Oct 06, 2005, 19:05)
        Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 06, 2005, 20:38)
        Re: mike croley (morfe, Oct 06, 2005, 21:27)
        Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 06, 2005, 22:53)
        Re: mike croley (morfe, Oct 06, 2005, 23:04)
        Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 08, 2005, 11:39)
        Re: mike croley (morfe, Oct 08, 2005, 22:29)
        Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 08, 2005, 23:55)
        Re: mike croley (morfe, Oct 09, 2005, 11:51)
        Re: mike croley (morfe, Oct 09, 2005, 11:51)
        Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 09, 2005, 13:23)
        Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 08, 2005, 23:56)
        Re: mike croley (Zastrozzi, Oct 06, 2005, 23:10)
        Re: mike croley (morfe, Oct 06, 2005, 23:18)
        Re: mike croley (theotherwindow, Oct 06, 2005, 23:21)
      - Re: mike croley (Zastrozzi, Oct 06, 2005, 19:01)
        Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 06, 2005, 20:45)
        Re: mike croley (Zastrozzi, Oct 06, 2005, 21:55)
        Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 06, 2005, 22:44)
  - Re: mike croley (jb lamptoast-morsley, Oct 06, 2005, 21:11)
    - Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 06, 2005, 21:14)
      - Re: mike croley (jb lamptoast-morsley, Oct 06, 2005, 21:18)
      - Re: mike croley (Ether, Oct 06, 2005, 23:36)
        Re: mike croley (mike croley, Oct 09, 2005, 11:09)
        Re: mike croley (Ether, Oct 09, 2005, 15:12)
    - Re: mike croley (Zastrozzi, Oct 06, 2005, 23:26)
      - Re: mike croley (theotherwindow, Oct 06, 2005, 23:49)
        Re: mike croley (Zastrozzi, Oct 07, 2005, 08:28)
        Re: mike croley (Rolling Ronnie, Oct 07, 2005, 09:27)
        Re: mike croley (Zastrozzi, Oct 07, 2005, 11:27)
Limerick (theotherwindow, Oct 07, 2005, 11:20)
- Re: Limerick (morfe, Oct 07, 2005, 11:54)
  - Re: Limerick (Vybik Jon, Oct 07, 2005, 12:13)
    - Re: Limerick (Popel Vooje, Oct 18, 2005, 16:59)
      - Re: Limerick (Nat, Oct 18, 2005, 17:18)
- Re: Limerick (Vybik Jon, Oct 18, 2005, 17:20)
  - Re: Limerick (theotherwindow, Oct 19, 2005, 10:32)
Heh-heh (anthonyqkiernan, Oct 07, 2005, 13:37)
- While i'm at it... (anthonyqkiernan, Oct 07, 2005, 13:37)
  - Re: While i'm at it... (jb lamptoast-morsley, Oct 07, 2005, 18:05)
Re: mike croley (kalamansi, Oct 11, 2005, 21:33)
- Re: mike croley (Zastrozzi, Oct 12, 2005, 08:09)
  - Re: mike croley (Rolling Ronnie, Oct 12, 2005, 11:30)
    - Re: mike croley (Zastrozzi, Oct 12, 2005, 11:48)
mike croley? (Vybik Jon, Oct 18, 2005, 14:53)
- Re: mike croley? (mike croley, Oct 18, 2005, 19:23)
  - Caption Competition? (FourWinds, Oct 18, 2005, 19:34)
    - Re: Caption Competition? (mike croley, Oct 18, 2005, 20:55)
    - Re: Caption Competition? (Nat, Oct 19, 2005, 10:34)
  - Re: mike croley? (Vybik Jon, Oct 19, 2005, 10:56)
Re: mike croley (tomtom, Mar 02, 2006, 17:50)
- Re: mike croley (PMM, Mar 02, 2006, 23:42)
  - Re: mike croley (anthonyqkiernan, Mar 03, 2006, 10:22)
- Re: mike croley (mojojojo, Mar 03, 2006, 09:57)
  - Re: mike croley (anthonyqkiernan, Mar 03, 2006, 10:22)

Terms & Conditions | Home | Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Top of page

The Modern Antiquarian

In reply to:

1 reply:

Messages in this topic: