I understand what you're saying, but the "tight ship" format might quickly need someone on the case virtually full time, not to mention endless debate about the precise lines we should take, so it may be an impracticable ideal unless anyone fancies the job. So I thought maybe we should go the other way with broad brush editorial control. Provide a sounding board but not necessarily an endorsement.
It's a crucial issue to be decided.
This topic is locked | Posted by nigelswift 5th November 2003ce 21:14 |
Getting Serious about Conservation (nigelswift, Nov 05, 2003, 07:09)- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 08:39)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 10:22)
- rockulous idea sirrah... (morfe, Nov 05, 2003, 15:41)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (morfe, Nov 05, 2003, 15:45)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Moth, Nov 05, 2003, 15:55)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kammer, Nov 05, 2003, 15:59)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 16:02)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 05, 2003, 16:08)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Moth, Nov 05, 2003, 16:15)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 05, 2003, 16:18)
- AHA (morfe, Nov 05, 2003, 16:20)
- AFAH (Jane, Nov 05, 2003, 16:22)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kammer, Nov 05, 2003, 16:45)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (nigelswift, Nov 05, 2003, 16:26)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Moth, Nov 05, 2003, 16:29)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Earthstepper, Nov 05, 2003, 16:36)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 05, 2003, 16:36)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 17:39)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 16:01)
- Here's my best shot... (Kammer, Nov 05, 2003, 16:51)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (ocifant, Nov 05, 2003, 19:02)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (nigelswift, Nov 05, 2003, 19:57)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 20:01)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 21:01)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (nigelswift, Nov 05, 2003, 21:14)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 21:43)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 21:59)
- DMV (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 22:04)
- Re: DMV (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 22:24)
- Oh! (FourWinds, Nov 06, 2003, 06:44)
- Proposed Format, for discussion (nigelswift, Nov 06, 2003, 07:44)
- Re: Proposed Format, for discussion (BrigantesNation, Nov 06, 2003, 09:51)
- Both? (FourWinds, Nov 06, 2003, 10:35)
- Dual identity? (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 09:57)
- Re: Proposed Format, for discussion (FourWinds, Nov 06, 2003, 10:34)
- How about ... (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 20:52)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (wysefool, Nov 05, 2003, 21:08)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (Steve Gray, Nov 06, 2003, 08:31)
- Let's settle the name today (nigelswift, Nov 06, 2003, 13:28)
- Re: Let's settle the name today (nickbrand, Nov 06, 2003, 13:38)
- Re: Let's settle the name today (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 06, 2003, 14:11)
- Heritage Action (grrr, Nov 06, 2003, 14:17)
- Re: Heritage Action (morfe, Nov 06, 2003, 14:41)
- Re: Heritage Action (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 06, 2003, 14:42)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (Moth, Nov 06, 2003, 14:43)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 06, 2003, 14:51)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (morfe, Nov 06, 2003, 15:03)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (nigelswift, Nov 06, 2003, 15:04)
- DO NOT GO FOR HAG !!! (FourWinds, Nov 06, 2003, 15:22)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 16:12)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (Kammer, Nov 06, 2003, 15:37)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (Moth, Nov 06, 2003, 16:32)
|
|