The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian
Home Latest Posts Forums Maps Help
Browse Sites News Blog Contributors The Books
Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   Stonehenge Forum Start a topic | Search
Stonehenge
Re: Stone Shifting
158 messages
Select a forum:
Maybe they “pulled” when on the level and “rowed” downhill, relying on the track-friction to act as a brake?

I can certainly see that using a combination of both methods you could get fantastic control – you could tilt the front upwards, just as you reached a small hillock, and you could steer it left and right by tilting one side but not the other, whilst pulling.

Also, when you came to a bigger hill, by tilting the front, adding a packing log, tilting the back, adding a larger packing log, then pulling, you could get up the whole hill in a series of small horizontal pulls. By the time you’d got to the top, you’d have travelled by means of a combination of 2 vectors: horizontal, entirely by bullocks pulling horizontally, and vertical, entirely by levers. Both vectors would have been achieved by the most appropriate and energy-efficient means.

I expect I mean oxen, not bullocks. But then, someone may tell me that bullocks is derived from bullox, so it might be right....


Reply | with quote
nigelswift
Posted by nigelswift
16th August 2003ce
11:41

In reply to:

Re: Stone Shifting (GordonP)

1 reply:

Re: Stone Shifting (GordonP)

Messages in this topic:

Terms & Conditions  |  Home  |  Julian Cope presents Head Heritage Top of page