Stonehenge forum 180 room
Image by jimit
close

This months Nat Geo has a typical article on Stonehenge running over six or seven pages with a big fold out poster of everyones favourite megalith and a snigger at the glacial deposit theory from some archaeos.

and a snigger at the glacial deposit theory from some archaeos....


Can someone tell me if the glacial deposit theory is generally sniggered at by mainstream archaeology or is it given equal credence with the bluestone transport theory? I've read lots on both sides and they both seem to have good points.... although.... might the magic name Burl ensure a duff theory is given more latitude than might otherwise be the case ????

Can anyone direct me to the thread discussing the glaciation or transportation theories as im sure this must have been discussed somewhere on this site but cant find it in the search.
Though not a archeologist myself i find the transportation theory incredible and in not convinced.

CianMcLiam wrote:
This months Nat Geo has a typical article on Stonehenge running over six or seven pages with a big fold out poster of everyones favourite megalith and a snigger at the glacial deposit theory from some archaeos.
Thanks for that Ken - off to supermarket for a copy. Got the utmost respect for Burl but the transport theory still feels like the right one.

...but I'll be the lone voice in the wilderness (or Salisbury Plain).

The stones were carried there.

http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c342/zvoncic/giant_skeleton.jpg

So what about the theory of levitation

The principle is that by using sound (Drums) you can create anti gravity by inversing the magnetic polarity of the stones.

The floating stones can then be gently manovered into place.

There are recorded account in the bible that sound was used to destroy citys.

The Stars Wars defence programme in the 80 spoke about using sound as a weapon

Telsa talked about anti Gravity

How was Coral Castle built by a loan fraile old man.