Ey up Tuesday!
< we 'found' some interesting little potential sites in the woods near fernworthy - hut circles, a possible stone row and a possible monolith - none listed here as far as i am aware. but then we're not experts and bearing in mind the brouhaha over David's Cairns, it would seem premature to post them. >
I like the sound of your potential finds. But on the whole I can only echo what PeterH said on the matter. But just because it aint listed, doesn't necessarily mean it's not the real thing either. Get the old maps out, go to the library, check with the local archaeology units. If nowt comes back from any of these, you might be onto something. There's plenty of old carvings, cairns and monoliths I've come across down the years which weren't in the archaeological records. And keep in mind, that the greater majority of archaeological finds (certainly from my experience in Yorkshire anyway) are made by enthusiastic amateurs.
As for StoneLifter's words:
< Take a decent compass and write down approximate headings, see if there's anything special on the horizon. Visit and revisit before drawing conclusions. Talk to the birds! >
I go along with his sentiments - but there's much much more than just doing that. And if he reckons his findings are worth his salt, he should know that himself already. Alignments are no way of ascertaining the veracity of alleged archaeological sites (if that were the case we'd be sure that the White Horse of Kilburn in N.Yorks was etched 4000 years ago, cos it coincidentally aligns with a stone circle). One word of advice though: if you're gonna talk to archaeologists about your findings, record what you've found first. They're notorious for nicking other people's finds and claiming them for themselves!
< perhaps there could be a 'pending further investigation' group? >
I think that's a damn good idea. Especially in the light of those blatantly screwy old cairns which you referred to earlier, which no-one but Mr ShirtLifter thinks is real.