There's varying degrees of plausibility in these outsider theories. John Michell, Julian Cope, Paul Devereaux all have their moments (to name a few). They're not confined to the rigidity of academia but they're good fun. (According to my interpretation of received sense data)
 Reply | with quote | Posted by olly
1st September 2022ce
15:31 |
Why are archaeologists apparently so dismissive about the existence of the Avebury faces? (Nightfolio, May 25, 2022, 00:13)- Re: Why are archaeologists apparently so dismissive about the existence of the Avebury faces? (Zariadris, May 25, 2022, 12:39)
- Re: Why are archaeologists apparently so dismissive about the existence of the Avebury faces? (tjj, May 31, 2022, 20:07)
- Re: Why are archaeologists apparently so dismissive about the existence of the Avebury faces? (olly, Aug 23, 2022, 09:10)
- Re: Why are archaeologists apparently so dismissive about the existence of the Avebury faces? (harestonesdown, Aug 29, 2022, 19:09)
- Re: Why are archaeologists apparently so dismissive about the existence of the Avebury faces? (olly, Sep 01, 2022, 15:31)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Why are archaeologists apparently so dismissive about the existence of the Avebury faces? (harestonesdown)