I also had a look at the site (linked to original post) I think it provides great evidence of the faces in the stones being deliberately chosen and or carved. Meaden also suggests that stones were chosen for their anthropomorphism and in some cases tweaked to maximise this.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by olly
23rd August 2022ce
13:21 |
Why are archaeologists apparently so dismissive about the existence of the Avebury faces? (Nightfolio, May 25, 2022, 00:13)- Re: Why are archaeologists apparently so dismissive about the existence of the Avebury faces? (Zariadris, May 25, 2022, 12:39)
- Re: Why are archaeologists apparently so dismissive about the existence of the Avebury faces? (tjj, May 31, 2022, 20:07)
- Re: Why are archaeologists apparently so dismissive about the existence of the Avebury faces? (olly, Aug 23, 2022, 09:10)
- Re: Why are archaeologists apparently so dismissive about the existence of the Avebury faces? (olly, Aug 23, 2022, 13:21)
- Re: Why are archaeologists apparently so dismissive about the existence of the Avebury faces? (harestonesdown, Aug 29, 2022, 19:09)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Why are archaeologists apparently so dismissive about the existence of the Avebury faces?