The subject of Stonehenge always elicits controversy and I can understand why, but I've never understood the antipathy towards MPP. Is it "science-led"?
I saw him at a lecture at Leicester University 5 or 6 years ago, arranged by the Leicestershire Field-walkers Group and the first thing he acknowledged when he got on his feet was that the audience was peppered with sceptics, not of his subject, but HIM.
In my experience, that's in the nature of archaeological endeavour. I just don't understand why it's gets so personal.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by tomatoman
13th February 2021ce
13:13 |
Stonehenge (moss, Feb 12, 2021, 09:19)- Re: Stonehenge (Monganaut, Feb 12, 2021, 13:35)
- Re: Stonehenge (thesweetcheat, Feb 12, 2021, 13:48)
- Re: Stonehenge (Sanctuary, Feb 13, 2021, 09:01)
- Re: Stonehenge (tjj, Feb 13, 2021, 18:32)
- Re: Stonehenge (Sanctuary, Feb 22, 2021, 20:57)
- Re: Stonehenge (thelonious, Feb 23, 2021, 09:56)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Stonehenge (GLADMAN)