nigelswift wrote: ironstone wrote: what's the real (as opposed to ideal) alternative?
The entirely real alternative is to build the tunnel a bit longer, say 4.5 miles instead of a niggardly 2.9 miles.
This can't be claimed to be technically impossible as we built a rail tunnel of 4.5 miles under the Severn 150 years ago.
Nor can it be claimed to be too expensive as we are going to build a tunnel for HS2 under the Chilterns which will be 10 miles long.
Hi Nigel, you know I'm your biggest fan but have to say in this instance I totally disagree. I do not understand why the Government has agreed to spend all this money (plus ++) on such a controversial road/tunnel scheme that benefits only the south of England at a time when the country has gone deeper and deeper into debt to keep afloat during these historically awful times. A monumental folly.
Small wonder Scotland wants to break loose.
Reply | with quote | Posted by tjj 16th November 2020ce 10:13 |
Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (tjj, Nov 12, 2020, 18:04)- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (thesweetcheat, Nov 13, 2020, 09:25)
- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (GLADMAN, Nov 15, 2020, 00:16)
- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (thelonious, Nov 16, 2020, 18:51)
- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (thesweetcheat, Nov 18, 2020, 08:53)
- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (nigelswift, Dec 01, 2020, 17:20)
- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (Howburn Digger, Dec 01, 2020, 18:49)
|
|