Forgive me if this comes across as incredibly naive but it seems to me that we have finally (after 40/50 years or more of debate etc) arrived at the least worst option for resolving/addressing all of the myriad issues surrounding the need to improve traffic flow around Stonehenge without desecrating the site. No scheme was ever going to please everyone and unless I've missed something, I haven't seen one that is so much 'better' than this that we should go on debating it for another 40/50 years. As someone for whom driving on that section of the A303 is, has been and will continue to be an inescapable part of my life I think it's time finally to say 'ok, let's do it', to accept the result and move on. I know that view will be unacceptable to many who use this site but what's the real (as opposed to ideal) alternative?
 Reply | with quote | Posted by ironstone
15th November 2020ce
17:25 |
Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (tjj, Nov 12, 2020, 18:04)- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (thesweetcheat, Nov 13, 2020, 09:25)
- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (GLADMAN, Nov 15, 2020, 00:16)
- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (thelonious, Nov 16, 2020, 18:51)
- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (thesweetcheat, Nov 18, 2020, 08:53)
- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (nigelswift, Dec 01, 2020, 17:20)
- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (Howburn Digger, Dec 01, 2020, 18:49)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (tjj)