nigelswift wrote: Do we have a modern stuff category? We ought to.
There is the "Disputed antiquity" tag that the Editors add to sites of... well, disputed antiquity. Although this one is not disputed, so it technically fails that remit, but at the same time it *could* keep it on the site.
If I were to start a counter rumour that the land owner is making it up as he doesn't want people traipsing across his land, maybe that could be a loophole? ;)
G x
 Reply | with quote | Posted by goffik
23rd January 2019ce
09:52 |
Newly identified recumbent stone circle (thelonious, Dec 13, 2018, 14:32)- Re: Newly identified recumbent stone circle (thelonious, Dec 13, 2018, 14:51)
- Re: Newly identified recumbent stone circle (Howburn Digger, Dec 13, 2018, 17:05)
- Re: Newly identified recumbent stone circle (GLADMAN, Dec 15, 2018, 10:41)
- Re: Newly identified recumbent stone circle (drewbhoy, Dec 15, 2018, 17:39)
- nope (juamei, Jan 21, 2019, 14:49)
- Re: nope (treehugger-uk, Jan 21, 2019, 16:17)
- Re: nope (nigelswift, Jan 21, 2019, 16:20)
- Re: nope (drewbhoy, Jan 22, 2019, 00:23)
- Re: nope (nigelswift, Jan 22, 2019, 09:55)
- Re: nope (drewbhoy, Jan 22, 2019, 11:32)
- Re: nope (nigelswift, Jan 22, 2019, 12:05)
- Re: nope (drewbhoy, Jan 22, 2019, 12:27)
- Re: nope (thelonious, Jan 22, 2019, 12:52)
- Re: nope (drewbhoy, Jan 22, 2019, 12:59)
- Re: nope (ryaner, Jan 22, 2019, 18:40)
- Re: nope (nigelswift, Jan 23, 2019, 05:31)
- Re: nope (goffik, Jan 23, 2019, 09:52)
- Re: Newly identified recumbent stone circle (costaexpress, Jan 25, 2019, 12:51)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: nope (nigelswift)