My view, as I said in an earlier post, is that it can't be done without affecting known and possibly unknown sites and that upgrading the existing routes to Marlborough and Calne would be the less destructive way forward.
If something is discovered during any bypass build, I would imagine the Arch's would have come in get as much data as possible in a limited time then it would be gone forever. I personally wouldn't want to see that happen.
Reply | with quote | Posted by scubi63 7th February 2016ce 21:15 |
A bypass through Avebury ?? (tjj, Feb 07, 2016, 10:18)- Re: A bypass through Avebury ?? (Sanctuary, Feb 07, 2016, 10:36)
- Re: A bypass through Avebury ?? (nigelswift, Feb 07, 2016, 11:06)
- Re: A bypass through Avebury ?? (thesweetcheat, Feb 07, 2016, 11:34)
- Re: A bypass through Avebury ?? (scubi63, Feb 07, 2016, 13:18)
- Re: A bypass through Avebury ?? (carol27, Feb 07, 2016, 19:11)
- Re: A bypass through Avebury ?? (CARL, Feb 07, 2016, 20:50)
- Re: A bypass through Avebury ?? (scubi63, Feb 07, 2016, 21:15)
|
|