The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian

Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   Stonehenge Forum Start a topic | Search
Re: Stonehenge is second hand
59 messages
Select a forum:
The proof of a proto Stonehenge is surely not disputed, there are clearly reused bluestones of a pillar and lintel monument, at Stonehenge itself, so there was an earlier bluestone monument somewhere that predated the sarsen monument. This is not speculation, unlike the possibility of glacial transport, which has the mechanism to do half a job, but not the means to carve and assemble lintels onto pillars.
Human intervention is a certainty, glacial intervention is not.

Reply | with quote
Posted by cerrig
12th December 2015ce

In reply to:

Re: Stonehenge is second hand (mountainman)

Messages in this topic: