To give him his due though, he does seem to have a better 'hit rate' RE: uncovering interesting ancient bits and bobs, and at least he'll stick his neck out, be his theory right or wrong, for twats like me to mull over.
I'd rather all archaeologists were a little more open with their theories, rather than hoarding them under their bed till the pop off this mortal coil.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Monganaut
7th December 2015ce
23:50 |
Stonehenge is second hand (nigelswift, Dec 07, 2015, 08:55)- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 07, 2015, 09:34)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Monganaut, Dec 07, 2015, 20:11)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 07, 2015, 21:06)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Monganaut, Dec 07, 2015, 21:42)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 07, 2015, 22:13)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Monganaut, Dec 07, 2015, 22:21)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 07, 2015, 22:36)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Monganaut, Dec 07, 2015, 23:22)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Evergreen Dazed, Dec 07, 2015, 23:51)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Monganaut, Dec 08, 2015, 00:09)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Evergreen Dazed, Dec 08, 2015, 00:20)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Evergreen Dazed, Dec 08, 2015, 00:28)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Monganaut, Dec 08, 2015, 00:53)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Evergreen Dazed, Dec 08, 2015, 07:55)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (moss, Dec 08, 2015, 07:59)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (Evergreen Dazed, Dec 08, 2015, 07:59)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan, Dec 08, 2015, 08:31)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (goffik, Dec 08, 2015, 13:55)
- Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tjj, Dec 09, 2015, 10:00)
- Stonehenge wasn't first second hand monument (thesweetcheat, Dec 12, 2015, 13:33)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Stonehenge is second hand (tiompan)