nigelswift wrote: "I think there's a valid debate to be had around solstice access and the cost of allowing it, but now one filled with hyperbole and venom."
In other words, you concede I was right all along, as are the others here who've said the same thing. Jolly good.
(No need to insult me any more, fair minded persons here gathered can see you've done that quite enough, without me having deserved it or risen to it. Nor will I.)
Well I see you've decided that I've conceded the discussion (when I haven't), insulted you (when I haven't), and determined what every single other person thinks. That's quite an achievement for one post.
Reply | with quote | Posted by Mustard 15th August 2014ce 16:10 |
Stonehenge - again! (CARL, Jul 10, 2014, 13:39)- Re: Stonehenge - again! (juamei, Jul 10, 2014, 13:43)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (Evergreen Dazed, Jul 10, 2014, 15:51)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (sleeptowin, Jul 14, 2014, 10:27)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (CARL, Aug 06, 2014, 12:23)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (CARL, Aug 11, 2014, 13:05)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (sleeptowin, Aug 11, 2014, 15:54)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (sleeptowin, Aug 14, 2014, 09:09)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (sleeptowin, Aug 14, 2014, 15:41)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (Sanctuary, Aug 14, 2014, 21:31)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (Sanctuary, Aug 15, 2014, 21:17)
|
|