"It's very small-minded to resent other people getting something for free"
So let's test your large-mindedness:
EH is skint. It has been given just £80 million to look after 400 massive properties forever and told to raise any further money if and where it can. Money matters.
The Druids say less than 2 dozen of them are present in the circle at Solstice yet tens of thousands are there insisting they should contribute nothing towards the £200K cost of the event - because it's their right.
So, how much money do YOU think is OK to spend on maintaining their (unproven) right? 400K? £1 million. £5 million? Surely you have a figure in mind at which you'd say - no, it would be better spent on some other heritage preservation? Or is there no limit lest someone calls you a Daily Mail reader?
Come on, no wriggling, how much should the event be subsidised by?
PS, lest you didn't notice, no wriggling! : £--------
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 14th August 2014ce 15:04 |
Stonehenge - again! (CARL, Jul 10, 2014, 13:39)- Re: Stonehenge - again! (juamei, Jul 10, 2014, 13:43)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (Evergreen Dazed, Jul 10, 2014, 15:51)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (sleeptowin, Jul 14, 2014, 10:27)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (CARL, Aug 06, 2014, 12:23)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (CARL, Aug 11, 2014, 13:05)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (sleeptowin, Aug 11, 2014, 15:54)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (sleeptowin, Aug 14, 2014, 09:09)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (sleeptowin, Aug 14, 2014, 15:41)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (Sanctuary, Aug 14, 2014, 21:31)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (Sanctuary, Aug 15, 2014, 21:17)
|
|